About

Your engineers have AI tools.
They're not shipping AI that delivers ROI!

The Claude Code moment happened in December 2025. Your team is two months behind. We close the gap.

Trusted by leading enterprises

20,000+Engineers Upskilled
600+FAANG Practitioners On Board
4.8on Trustpilot
12Years

Where our practitioners have built and shipped

Google
Meta
Amazon
Apple
Microsoft
Netflix

THE GAP

Everyone bought AI tools.
No one changed the workflow.

1

December 2025 was the tipping point. AI models stopped hallucinating after an hour - they now run for a week, ship production code, and build entire features autonomously. But most engineering teams are still coding the way they did in 2024.

2

Some engineers figured it out solo. Most are stuck. And the gap between your best and your rest is growing every week.

3

You bought Copilot seats. Usage is at 20%. Tool licenses don't equal tool adoption - workflow change does.

4

A lunch-and-learn won't cut it. Neither will another vendor demo. Your engineers need to build with these tools on real code, with people who've already shipped this way.

You don't need more tools. You need engineers who think in agentic workflows.

GET STARTED

Two approaches to close the gap

ACCELERATION

You have a roadmap. You need the team to move.

You know what your engineers need - you need practitioners who can get them there fast. Two-day workshops on your stack, your codebase. They leave building, not watching.

Explore Acceleration →

BLUEPRINT

You're early. You need a roadmap first.

Not sure which teams need what, or where to prioritize? In 5 business days, you get a gap heat map, top use cases, and a 90-day action plan. Agent-powered. Practitioner-reviewed.

Explore Blueprint →
20,000+Engineers Upskilled
600+FAANG Practitioners On Board
4.8on Trustpilot
12Years
4.8/5Trustpilot(500+ reviews)
View reviews ›

Where our practitioners have built and shipped

Google
Meta
Amazon
Apple
Microsoft
Netflix

Our Practitioners

See all practitioners ›
JP

Jay Pillai

Engineering Leader - GenAI

Google

Leads GenAI engineering programs

Adam Dong

Adam Dong

Software Engineer

Google, Apple

Google, Apple

Quazie Kwaselow

Quazie Kwaselow

Software Engineer

Lyft, Microsoft, Dropbox

Lyft, Microsoft, Dropbox

Margaret Northup

Margaret Northup

Software Engineer

Meta, Amazon

Meta, Amazon

I really liked the course. For many working professionals, going through examples and different perspectives are very valuable in interview preparation. I started interviewing for Facebook in May, the...

MK
Mike Kane

Mike Kane

I started Acceler right before SIP (shelter in place 2020) happened, so my options for companies decreased due to industry wide layoffs and hiring freezes. I always struggled with interview questions....

My time at Acceler was great! The course provided all the material and support I needed to develop a deeper understanding of the concepts and interview process. There were so many valuable insights th...

JJ
Justine Jones

Justine Jones

What Leaders Say

After 13 years of writing code the same way, I was skeptical about AI tools. The practitioner-led approach changed that. Building agents on my own codebase - not toy examples - made the difference. I now think in workflows, not just functions.

RBK, 13 years experience

What leaders say...

As a manager, I needed to understand what AI adoption actually looks like for my team - not the vendor pitch version. The program gave me a practical framework for rolling out agentic workflows across my org and measuring real adoption, not just seat licenses.

VJ
Vineet Joglekar

Vineet Joglekar

Software Development Manager, Amazon

I've been doing ML for years, but agentic workflows are a different discipline. The program taught me patterns I hadn't seen - how to orchestrate multi-step agents, handle failures gracefully, and integrate them into existing CI/CD pipelines. It filled a gap traditional ML didn't cover.

SM
Safir Merchant

Safir Merchant

Machine Learning Software Engineer

This program is totally worth the investment. I had several interviews in the past where I'd freeze and make silly mistakes. Going through the mock interviews was super helpful — the structured practice gave me confidence I didn't have before.

UE
Uchenna Edeh

Senior Site Reliability Engineer, Twitter

As an experienced engineer at Microsoft, I had a clear idea of the bar to clear — but hadn't practiced in years. The course was intense: 2+ hours every day for two months. And it works. All that practice had a long-lasting effect on my ability as a software engineer. I am simply faster at coding than I ever was.

DT
Davide Testuggine
Davide Testuggine

Senior Software Engineer, Meta (ex-Microsoft)

Acceler provides a solid platform to not only strengthen your skills — I've had the pleasure of meeting some of the best and brightest minds in the industry. If you are looking for more than just a bootcamp, I would wholeheartedly suggest Acceler.

RD
Rupesh Dabbir
Rupesh Dabbir

Senior Engineer

For working professionals, going through examples and different perspectives is incredibly valuable. The structure helped me understand each problem deeply. The high sense of camaraderie in the cohort and mock interviews with practitioners were super helpful in finding my weaknesses.

MK
Mike Kane

Mike Kane

Senior Software Engineer

All of the practitioners were extremely knowledgeable and willing to help. The foundational videos, practice problems, and test questions really helped me. I still continue to look back at my notes and do practice problems to keep my skills sharp. This program is what a lot of people in the industry need.

JL
Jaime Lichauco
Jaime Lichauco

Senior Software Engineer

Ready to close the gap?

Pick the approach that fits. Or start a conversation.

Pilot with one team. Scale when you see results.